Take Action: Tell SEC to Require Disclosure of CEO-to-Worker Pay Ratios

CEO-to-Worker Pay RatiosClick here now to tell the SEC to require companies to disclose CEO-to-worker pay ratios. If you own stock, click here to get information on how to vote your shares on “say-on-pay” proxy proposals.

The Dodd-Frank act requires it but the SEC has failed to act and has come under increased pressure from business lobbying groups to drop the rulemaking altogether. CEO pay is out-of-control, but we have a chance to rein it in.

CEOs of the largest companies now make 380 times the pay of the average worker in the United States. This growing income inequality is hurting our nation’s economy and working families.

As I have noted in many posts, according to Bebchuk, Lucian A. and Grinstein, Yaniv (The Growth of Executive Pay, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 283-303, 2005), the aggregate compensation paid by public companies to their top-five executives during the period 1993-2003 totaled about $350 billion, and the ratio of this aggregate top-five compensation to the aggregate earnings of these firms increased from 5 percent in 1993-1995 to about 10 percent in 2001-2003.

At the same time, few firms want to admit to having average executives, so they seek to compensate their executives at above-average levels. They survey executive compensation at corporations and then set compensation packages that are above average for their “peer group,” which is often chosen aspirationally. While the “Lake Woebegone effect” may be nice in fictional towns, “where all the children are above average,” it doesn’t work well for society to have all CEOs considered above average and their collective pay spiraling out of control.

Runaway CEO pay is bad for our economy and it’s bad for the morale of working families. Employees at every level, from the executive suite to the mailroom, contribute to making a company successful.

But companies act as if CEOs alone are responsible for the success of our companies. That’s why the average CEO of an S&P 500 company received a 13.9 percent raise in 2011 compensation—to an astounding $12.94 million.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires public companies to disclose CEO-to-worker pay ratios. Disclosing these pay ratios may shame companies into stopping runaway CEO pay. Academic studies show that large pay disparities within a company can hurt employee teamwork, productivity, loyalty and motivation. The impact of high levels of CEO pay on employee morale is particularly important in today’s weak economy, when workers are being asked to do more for less.

The interests of the 1% does not outweigh the views of working families who feel CEO pay has run amok.

Click here now to send a quick e-mail to the SEC and demand that the CEO-to-worker pay ratio disclosure rule be issued ASAP. If you’re a shareowner concerned about these issues, you should also consider joining the United States Proxy Exchange, a “chamber of commerce” for retail shareowners. For less than $50 a year, you’ll get critical news and helpful guidance to increase the value of your companies through enhanced corporate governance.

Thank you for acting to help us rein in out-of-control CEO pay and standing up for working families. Thanks to Brandon Rees of the Office of Investment, AFL-CIO for setting up this semi-automated comment link to urge the rulemaking by the SEC.

To contact James McRitchie directly, please email jm@corpgov.net

Thank you for reading this investor activism blog. Please contact Info@TheShareholderActivist.com to request advice and recommendations on services and solutions to support corporate social responsibility and your shareholder activism. We also encourage you to submit your comments so that we can share your experiences with our growing community of shareholder activists.
Posted in Corporate Governance, Featured | 1 Comment

One Response to Take Action: Tell SEC to Require Disclosure of CEO-to-Worker Pay Ratios

  1. Update: Theories of optimal market-based contracting are misguided because they are based on the notion of vigorous, competitive markets for transferable executive talent;
    Even boards comprised of the fiduciaries faithful to shareholder interests will fail to reach an agreeable resolution to compensation when they rely on the flawed and unnecessary process of peer benchmarking;
    Systemically, a formulaic reliance on peer grouping will lead to spiraling executive compensation, even if peer groups are well constructed and comparable; and
    The solution is to avoid arbitrary application of peer group data to set executive compensation levels. Instead, compensation committees must develop internal pay standards based on the specific company, its competitive environment and its dynamics. Relevant considerations include an executive’s current and historic performance and internal pay equity. Some reference to peer groups may be warranted, but the compensation process must maintain the flexibility necessary to arrive at a reasonable approximation to what is absolutely necessary to retain and encourage talent.
    See http://irrcinstitute.org/news/peer-group-benchmarking-inherently-flawed-and-inflationary_pr_09-22-2012.php